The AIF-C01 exam and the AWS AI stack: what is tested and where each service sits
What the AWS Certified AI Practitioner exam tests, how its five domains are weighted, how the AWS AI stack is layered, the keywords that decide scenario questions, and how the rest of this series follows the blueprint.
On this page
The AWS Certified AI Practitioner exam is a foundational certificate: it does not ask anyone to write code or tune a model, but it does expect a clear picture of what AI, machine learning and generative AI are, which AWS service does which job, and how to build with them responsibly and securely. Almost every question is a short business scenario with one detail that decides the answer. This article sets out the exam itself, the layered stack of AWS services the questions draw on, the keywords that map scenarios to services, and how the eleven articles that follow cover the blueprint in order.
The map
Read this first when short on time. Every branch is a section below.
The exam: format, scoring and question types
AIF-C01 is a foundational-level AWS certification that checks understanding of AI, machine learning and generative AI concepts and of the AWS services built around them, without requiring hands-on building.
The paper has 65 questions, of which 50 count and 15 are unscored items AWS is trialling; there is no way to tell which is which, so every question deserves the same care. The time allowed is 90 minutes, and a 30-minute extension is available on request for people whose first language is not English. Results are scaled to a range of 100 to 1000 and the pass mark is 700; the scaled score is not a percentage, and AWS does not publish how many raw marks it takes. The certificate is valid for three years. There is no prerequisite, though the exam assumes roughly six months of exposure to AI or ML on AWS in any role, technical or not.
| Question type | What it looks like | How to work it |
|---|---|---|
| Multiple choice | One correct answer, three distractors | Find the constraint word, eliminate the three that ignore it |
| Multiple response | Two or more correct answers out of five or more; the stem says how many | No partial credit; pick exactly the number asked |
| Ordering | Put three to five steps in sequence (a pipeline, a lifecycle) | Know the canonical order of the ML lifecycle, the RAG flow, the FM lifecycle |
| Matching | Pair items from two lists (services to use cases, metrics to problems) | Match the certain pairs first, then the leftovers |
| Case study | One scenario followed by two or more questions | Read the scenario once, carefully; each question re-uses it |
Unanswered questions score zero, so nothing is lost by guessing. There is no penalty for a wrong answer.
The exam is written for a broad audience, so the correct answer is almost always the mainstream AWS way of doing something rather than a clever alternative. When two answers would both work, the one that is managed, native to AWS and needs less expertise is the one the question wants.
- AWS Skill Builder hosts the free exam prep course and the official practice question set that mirror the real paper's style; the phrasing of the questions there is the phrasing to expect.
- Pearson VUE delivers the exam at test centres and as an online proctored session; the online version needs a clean desk, a webcam and a room with nobody else in it.
- AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner is the sibling foundational exam; the two share the shared-responsibility, IAM and pricing basics, and the AI Practitioner assumes them.
- Scaled score
- A raw mark converted onto a fixed 100 to 1000 range so that different versions of the paper are comparable. 700 passes.
- Unscored item
- A question AWS includes to gather statistics before it counts; indistinguishable from a scored one.
Five domains and their weights
The exam guide splits the content into five domains, each a percentage of the scored questions, and each domain into numbered task statements that list the exact concepts, services and terms in scope.
flowchart TD D1["Domain 1<br/>Fundamentals of AI and ML<br/>20 percent"] --> D2["Domain 2<br/>Fundamentals of generative AI<br/>24 percent"] D2 --> D3["Domain 3<br/>Applications of foundation models<br/>28 percent"] D3 --> D4["Domain 4<br/>Guidelines for responsible AI<br/>14 percent"] D4 --> D5["Domain 5<br/>Security, compliance and governance<br/>14 percent"]
| Domain | Weight | Task statements | Services that dominate | In this series |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 · Fundamentals of AI and ML | 20% | 1.1 concepts and terms · 1.2 practical use cases · 1.3 the ML development lifecycle | SageMaker and its features; Rekognition, Textract, Comprehend, Transcribe, Polly, Translate, Lex, Kendra, Personalize | 2, 3, 4 |
| 2 · Fundamentals of generative AI | 24% | 2.1 concepts · 2.2 capabilities and limitations · 2.3 AWS infrastructure and technologies | Bedrock, SageMaker JumpStart, PartyRock, Amazon Q, Trainium, Inferentia | 5, 6, 7 |
| 3 · Applications of foundation models | 28% | 3.1 design considerations · 3.2 prompt engineering · 3.3 training and fine-tuning · 3.4 evaluation | Bedrock Knowledge Bases, Agents, Guardrails; OpenSearch, Aurora and other vector stores; Bedrock and Clarify model evaluation | 8, 9, 10 |
| 4 · Guidelines for responsible AI | 14% | 4.1 responsible development · 4.2 transparent and explainable models | SageMaker Clarify, Model Monitor, Model Cards, Augmented AI, Guardrails, AI Service Cards | 11 |
| 5 · Security, compliance and governance | 14% | 5.1 securing AI systems · 5.2 governance and compliance | IAM, KMS, Macie, PrivateLink, CloudTrail, Config, Inspector, Audit Manager, Artifact, Trusted Advisor | 12 |
The weights say where the marks are, but they also say something about the style of question. Domain 1 questions are mostly definitional: which learning type, which metric, which service. Domains 2 and 3 are scenario-heavy and almost always resolve to a Bedrock feature or to a choice between prompt engineering, retrieval and fine-tuning. Domains 4 and 5 are lists of tools and standards, where the work is knowing which named thing does which job.
Roughly one question in seven touches Amazon Bedrock directly, and many more do so indirectly through Knowledge Bases, Agents and Guardrails. Knowing the Bedrock article cold is the single highest-return piece of preparation.
- Amazon Bedrock appears in all five domains: as the generative AI platform in 2, the RAG and agent host in 3, the home of Guardrails in 4, and the service whose PrivateLink, KMS and CloudTrail story is asked about in 5.
- Amazon SageMaker carries domain 1's lifecycle, domain 3's fine-tuning and domain 4's Clarify, Model Monitor and Model Cards.
- The AWS exam guide lists every in-scope service and every out-of-scope one; anything not on the list (writing code, choosing instance sizes, designing networks) is not asked.
- Task statement
- A numbered bullet in the exam guide, such as 3.2, that names a skill and lists the concepts and services it draws on. Questions are written against task statements.
The stack: four layers of AWS AI services
AWS presents its AI offering as layers, from the chips that train models up to finished assistants, and every exam question about "which service" is really a question about which layer the scenario belongs on.
- Infrastructure. EC2 instances with NVIDIA GPUs, AWS's own Trainium chips for training and Inferentia chips for inference, S3 for data lakes, and SageMaker HyperPod for large training clusters. The exam wants to know these exist, that Trainium and Inferentia are the cost-efficient AWS silicon, and nothing about sizing them.
- ML platform. Amazon SageMaker, one service with many features covering the whole lifecycle: labelling, notebooks, training, tuning, deployment, monitoring. Anything that says "custom model", "our own training data" or "data scientists" is on this layer. Article 4 walks it.
- AI services. Pre-trained models behind APIs: Bedrock for foundation models and everything generative, and a family of task services for vision, documents, text, speech, search, recommendations and anomaly detection. "No ML expertise" and "least operational overhead" land here. Article 3 catalogues them; article 7 is all Bedrock.
- Applications. Finished assistants: Amazon Q Business over company data, Amazon Q Developer in the IDE and console, Q inside QuickSight and Connect, and PartyRock for building small generative apps with no code. "Employees ask questions about internal documents" is a Q Business question, not a Bedrock one.
Bedrock and SageMaker JumpStart both offer foundation models, and the exam likes the difference. Bedrock is serverless: one API, pay per token, no infrastructure. JumpStart deploys a model onto SageMaker endpoints you pay for by the hour and gives you the weights to fine-tune. "Serverless" or "pay per token" means Bedrock; "deploy to an endpoint", "open-source model with full control" means JumpStart.
- Amazon.com runs the same stack internally: SageMaker for its own models, Bedrock for generative features such as review summaries, Inferentia for serving Alexa.
- Anthropic trains and serves Claude on Trainium and Inferentia in AWS data centres, and Claude is one of the model families on Bedrock.
- Amazon Q Developer is itself an application built on Bedrock; it is the layer-four product that sits on the layer-three service.
- Foundation model
- A large model pre-trained on broad data that can be adapted to many tasks; the unit Bedrock serves. Article 5 defines it properly.
- Managed service
- A service where AWS runs the infrastructure and the customer only calls an API; the exam's default preference.
Keywords: the words in a scenario that decide the answer
Scenario questions embed one or two phrases that map directly to a service or a technique, and recognising those phrases is most of the skill the exam measures.
| The scenario says... | It is asking for | Where it is covered |
|---|---|---|
| "least operational overhead", "fully managed", "no infrastructure" | A managed AI service or Bedrock rather than SageMaker or EC2 | 3, 7 |
| "no ML expertise", "business analysts", "no code" | SageMaker Canvas, PartyRock, Amazon Q, or a task AI service | 4, 6 |
| "custom model", "own training data", "full control", "data scientists" | Amazon SageMaker | 4 |
| "answers from company documents", "up-to-date information", "cite sources", "without retraining" | Retrieval augmented generation: Bedrock Knowledge Bases, or Amazon Q Business, or Kendra | 8 |
| "specific tone or format", "domain vocabulary", "labelled examples" | Fine-tuning; "unlabelled domain text" means continued pre-training | 10 |
| "multi-step task", "call APIs", "book, look up and then reply" | Amazon Bedrock Agents | 7, 8 |
| "block harmful content", "avoid certain topics", "redact PII in responses", "reduce hallucinations" | Guardrails for Amazon Bedrock (contextual grounding for hallucinations) | 7, 11 |
| "consistent throughput", "predictable cost at scale" | Bedrock provisioned throughput; "large offline job" means batch inference | 6 |
| "more creative", "more deterministic" | Raise or lower temperature (and top-p, top-k) | 9 |
| "examples in the prompt", "reasoning steps" | Few-shot prompting; chain-of-thought | 9 |
| "detect bias in training data", "explain a prediction", "feature importance" | SageMaker Clarify | 11 |
| "data drift", "model quality degraded in production" | SageMaker Model Monitor | 4 |
| "human review of low-confidence predictions" | Amazon Augmented AI (A2I) | 11 |
| "document intended use and risks of a model" | SageMaker Model Cards; for AWS's own services, AI Service Cards | 11 |
| "summarisation quality", "translation quality", "semantic similarity" | ROUGE, BLEU, BERTScore respectively | 10 |
| "find PII in S3" | Amazon Macie; "PII in text at runtime" is Comprehend or a Guardrail | 12 |
| "traffic must not cross the internet" | VPC endpoints through AWS PrivateLink | 12 |
| "who called the API", "audit trail" | AWS CloudTrail | 12 |
| "compliance reports for auditors" | AWS Artifact; "collect evidence continuously" is Audit Manager; "resource configuration rules" is AWS Config | 12 |
The exam guide's own wording is the source of these phrases. When a question says "with the least effort" it is testing whether you reach for the managed service; when it says "the company's data must not be used to train the model" it is testing whether you know that Bedrock never trains base models on customer data and that a Knowledge Base adds knowledge without training anything.
- The AIF-C01 exam guide lists the exact terms it expects: "hallucinations", "nondeterminism", "in-context learning", "provisioned throughput", "algorithm accountability laws". A term on that list is a term that can be an answer option.
- AWS documentation pages for Bedrock features open with the same phrases the questions use, because the questions are written by people who wrote or read those pages.
Reading a scenario question
A scenario question is a short story with one constraint that matters and several details that do not, and a fixed method for reading it saves both time and marks.
flowchart TD
A([Read the last sentence first]) --> B["Find the constraint word:<br/>cheapest, least effort, no code,<br/>must not leave the VPC, most accurate"]
B --> C["Name the layer: application,<br/>AI service, SageMaker, or infrastructure"]
C --> D["Strike every option on the wrong layer<br/>or ignoring the constraint"]
D --> E{Two left?}
E -- No --> F([Answer])
E -- Yes --> G["Prefer managed over self-hosted,<br/>AWS native over third party,<br/>the option that also fits modality and data owner"]
G --> F
- Read the question sentence first, then the scenario. Knowing what is asked turns the scenario from a story into a search for one detail.
- Find the constraint. Cost, effort, expertise, latency, privacy, accuracy or compliance. There is nearly always exactly one, and it eliminates at least two options.
- Place the scenario on the stack. If nobody on the team is a data scientist, SageMaker training is wrong. If the data is the company's documents, a model that has not seen them cannot answer without retrieval.
- Check the modality and the data owner. Images versus text versus speech pick between Rekognition, Comprehend and Transcribe; company data versus public knowledge picks between retrieval and a plain model call.
- Break ties the AWS way: managed beats self-hosted, native beats third party, and a purpose-built service beats a general one when it exists ("intelligent search" is Kendra before it is OpenSearch).
- Two right answers, one cheaper. Both options might work; the constraint word picks. "Most cost-effective" with a nightly job means batch, not a real-time endpoint.
- A real service that does not fit. Distractors are real AWS services used in the wrong place: Macie (finds PII in S3) offered where Comprehend (finds PII in text at runtime) is wanted; Inspector (vulnerabilities) offered where Audit Manager (compliance evidence) is wanted.
- Fine-tuning versus retrieval. New knowledge, fresh data and citations point at RAG; new behaviour, format or vocabulary point at fine-tuning. The exam tests this pair more than any other.
- Reading "AI" as "generative AI". A forecasting or fraud scenario is classical ML and wants Forecast, Fraud Detector or SageMaker, not Bedrock.
- Case-study sets on the real paper reuse one scenario for several questions; the constraint word changes each time while the story stays the same.
- The official practice question set shows the distractor pattern above in almost every item, which is why it is worth doing once, slowly, with the explanations.
The series: how the next eleven articles follow the blueprint
The rest of the series covers the five domains in blueprint order, one article per group of task statements, so that reading it end to end walks the exam guide once.
| Article | Exam task statements | What it carries |
|---|---|---|
| 2 · AI, machine learning and deep learning | 1.1 | The vocabulary: AI vs ML vs DL, learning types, inference types, data types, fit, bias, the algorithm families by name |
| 3 · When machine learning fits, and which AWS AI service does what | 1.2 | When not to use ML, technique to problem, the full task-service catalogue with the keyword for each |
| 4 · The machine learning lifecycle on SageMaker | 1.3 | Pipeline stages, SageMaker features per stage, deployment options, MLOps, model and business metrics |
| 5 · Generative AI fundamentals | 2.1 | Tokens, chunking, embeddings, transformers, foundation models, diffusion, multimodal, the FM lifecycle |
| 6 · What generative AI can and cannot do, and the AWS stack built for it | 2.2, 2.3 | Hallucination and its cousins, model selection, business metrics, Bedrock vs JumpStart vs PartyRock vs Q, pricing modes |
| 7 · Amazon Bedrock | 2.3, 3.1 | Models and providers, inference parameters, Knowledge Bases, Agents, Guardrails, customisation, evaluation, security |
| 8 · Designing applications on foundation models | 3.1 | Model selection criteria, RAG end to end, vector stores on AWS, the customisation cost ladder, agents |
| 9 · Prompt engineering | 3.2 | Prompt anatomy, zero to few-shot, chain-of-thought, templates, best practices, injection, jailbreaks, poisoning |
| 10 · Customising and evaluating foundation models | 3.3, 3.4 | Pre-training, fine-tuning methods, RLHF, data preparation, ROUGE, BLEU, BERTScore, benchmarks, business objectives |
| 11 · Responsible AI | 4.1, 4.2 | The dimensions, bias types, Clarify, Model Monitor, A2I, Guardrails, Model Cards, explainability trade-offs |
| 12 · Security, compliance and governance | 5.1, 5.2 | IAM, KMS, Macie, PrivateLink, shared responsibility, lineage, Config, Inspector, Audit Manager, Artifact, CloudTrail, the Scoping Matrix |
Two ways to use it. First pass: read in order, because articles 8 to 10 assume the Bedrock article and articles 11 and 12 assume everything before them. Revision: open each article's map, expand it fully, and read the level-three facts as notes; then work the question set at the end of each article aloud, which is the closest thing to the exam's own format.
Spend time in proportion to the weights, but not strictly. Domain 3 is 28 percent and mostly Bedrock, RAG and prompting, which are also the most intuitive topics; domains 4 and 5 are 14 percent each but consist of lists of named tools that have to be memorised, and they are where most lost marks come from.
- The AWS exam guide is the authority for what is in scope; this series follows its task statements one for one, and any topic here that is not in the guide is marked as background.
- AWS Skill Builder's "Exam Prep Standard Course" covers the same order, which makes it a natural companion for a second pass.
Recap
- AIF-C01 is foundational: 65 questions (50 scored), 90 minutes, scaled 100 to 1000 with a pass at 700, valid three years, no code required.
- Question types are multiple choice, multiple response, ordering, matching and case study; there is no penalty for guessing and no partial credit on multiple response.
- Five domains: AI and ML fundamentals 20%, generative AI fundamentals 24%, applications of foundation models 28%, responsible AI 14%, security, compliance and governance 14%.
- The AWS AI stack has four layers: infrastructure (GPUs, Trainium, Inferentia, S3), the ML platform (SageMaker), AI services (Bedrock and the task services), and applications (Amazon Q, PartyRock).
- Higher layers need less expertise and give less control; "least operational overhead" climbs the stack, "custom model" descends it.
- Bedrock is serverless and pay per token; SageMaker JumpStart deploys a model to an endpoint you own.
- Company data in answers means retrieval (Knowledge Bases, Q Business, Kendra); new behaviour or vocabulary means fine-tuning; multi-step tasks with APIs mean Agents; harmful content and hallucinations mean Guardrails.
- Clarify explains and finds bias, Model Monitor finds drift, A2I adds human review, Model Cards document models.
- Macie finds PII in S3, PrivateLink keeps traffic off the internet, CloudTrail audits calls, Artifact hands out compliance reports, Audit Manager collects evidence, Config checks configurations.
- Read the question sentence first, find the constraint word, place the scenario on the stack, strike the wrong layer, and break ties toward managed and native.
- The next eleven articles follow the blueprint in order: 2 to 4 for domain 1, 5 to 7 for domain 2 and Bedrock, 8 to 10 for domain 3, 11 and 12 for domains 4 and 5.
Questions
Try answering each one out loud before opening it. Lead with the one-line answer, then the reasoning, then one detail that shows you have used it.
How is the AIF-C01 exam structured and scored?
It has 65 questions of which 50 are scored and 15 are unscored trial items, runs 90 minutes, and reports a scaled score from 100 to 1000 with 700 as the pass mark.
- Question types: multiple choice, multiple response, ordering, matching and case study.
- No penalty for wrong answers, so nothing should be left blank; multiple response has no partial credit.
- A 30-minute extension is available for non-native English speakers, requested before the sitting.
The scaled score is not a percentage, so 700 does not mean 70 percent of the questions right.
What are the five domains and their weights?
Fundamentals of AI and ML at 20 percent, Fundamentals of generative AI at 24, Applications of foundation models at 28, Guidelines for responsible AI at 14, and Security, compliance and governance for AI solutions at 14.
- Domains 2 and 3 together are 52 percent and are dominated by Amazon Bedrock and its features.
- Domain 1 is definitional; domains 4 and 5 are lists of named tools and standards.
- Each domain breaks into numbered task statements that list the in-scope terms.
The heaviest single domain, applications of foundation models, is also the most scenario-driven: RAG versus fine-tuning, prompts, agents and evaluation metrics.
Describe the layers of the AWS AI stack and what belongs on each.
Infrastructure at the bottom (EC2 GPU instances, Trainium, Inferentia, S3, HyperPod), the ML platform above it (Amazon SageMaker), AI services above that (Bedrock and the task services such as Rekognition, Comprehend and Transcribe), and applications on top (Amazon Q, PartyRock).
- Each layer trades control for convenience: SageMaker gives full control over a custom model; Bedrock gives an API; Q gives a finished assistant.
- Scenario keywords map to layers: "custom model" is SageMaker, "least operational overhead" is an AI service, "employees ask about internal documents" is Q Business.
- Trainium and Inferentia are AWS's own chips for cost-efficient training and inference.
Amazon Q Developer is itself built on Bedrock, an application-layer product sitting on a service-layer one.
A company wants to add a chatbot that answers from its own PDFs with citations, without training a model. Which approach and service?
Retrieval augmented generation with Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases, which indexes the documents into a vector store and grounds the model's answers in retrieved passages with citations.
- The phrases "own documents", "citations" and "without training" all point at retrieval rather than fine-tuning.
- Amazon Q Business is the finished-application alternative if no custom app is being built.
- Fine-tuning would teach style, not facts, and would need retraining as documents change.
Bedrock does not use customer data to train its base models, which is why the "no training" constraint is satisfied by design.
What is the difference between Amazon Bedrock and SageMaker JumpStart when both offer foundation models?
Bedrock is a serverless API where you pay per token and never see infrastructure; JumpStart deploys a model onto SageMaker endpoints that you pay for by the hour and can fine-tune with full control over the weights.
- "Serverless", "pay per use", "quickest to start" means Bedrock.
- "Open-source model", "deploy to an endpoint", "full control" means JumpStart.
- Both can fine-tune, but Bedrock's custom models then need provisioned throughput.
JumpStart lives inside SageMaker Studio and offers one-click deployment plus notebooks, which is the giveaway phrase in a question.
Which words in a scenario point at a managed AI service rather than SageMaker?
"Least operational overhead", "fully managed", "no ML expertise", "quickly" and "without managing infrastructure" all point up the stack to an AI service or Bedrock.
- "Custom model", "own training data", "data scientists" and "full control" point down to SageMaker.
- "No code" points at SageMaker Canvas or PartyRock.
- The modality then picks the service: images to Rekognition, documents to Textract, text to Comprehend, speech to Transcribe.
When both a managed service and a SageMaker build would work, the exam wants the managed one unless the scenario needs something the managed service cannot do.
A model in production has become less accurate over months. Which AWS feature detects this, and which one explains why a given prediction was made?
SageMaker Model Monitor detects data and model quality drift on a deployed endpoint; SageMaker Clarify explains predictions through feature attributions and also measures bias.
- Model Monitor compares live traffic with a baseline and raises alerts on drift.
- Clarify runs before training (data bias), after training (model bias) and for explainability.
- Amazon Augmented AI adds human review for low-confidence predictions.
Model Monitor can also watch bias drift and feature attribution drift, using Clarify under the hood.
Distinguish AWS Artifact, AWS Audit Manager, AWS Config, Amazon Inspector, AWS CloudTrail and AWS Trusted Advisor.
Artifact hands out AWS's own compliance reports; Audit Manager collects evidence from your account against a framework; Config records and evaluates resource configurations against rules; Inspector scans workloads for software vulnerabilities; CloudTrail logs every API call for audit; Trusted Advisor checks the account against best practices for cost, security and performance.
- "Reports for our auditors" is Artifact; "continuous evidence" is Audit Manager.
- "Was this bucket ever public" is Config; "who deleted the model" is CloudTrail.
- "Unpatched CVE on the instance" is Inspector.
These six appear together as options in domain 5 questions, so the one-line distinctions are worth memorising.
A team needs the model's answers to be more creative for marketing copy. What do they change?
They raise the temperature, and possibly top-p or top-k, which widens the set of tokens the model samples from and makes output more varied.
- Lower temperature makes output more deterministic, which suits extraction and classification.
- These are inference parameters, changed per request, not training settings.
- Maximum tokens and stop sequences control length, not creativity.
Temperature of zero does not guarantee identical output on every call, because the exam's own term for the model's behaviour is nondeterminism.
Which distractor pattern catches most people on scenario questions?
A real AWS service placed in the wrong role: Macie where Comprehend is wanted, Inspector where Audit Manager is wanted, fine-tuning where retrieval is wanted, Bedrock where a classical ML service such as Forecast fits.
- Every option is a real service, so "does this exist" never eliminates anything; "does it fit this constraint" does.
- Two options often both work, and the constraint word (cheapest, least effort, no internet) picks one.
- Reading "AI" as "generative AI" sends classical problems to Bedrock wrongly.
Reading the question sentence before the scenario and underlining the constraint word is the practical defence.
What does the exam mean by "the company's data must not be used to train the model", and which options satisfy it?
It means the customer's prompts, documents and outputs must stay private and never improve the provider's base model; Amazon Bedrock satisfies this by design, and adding knowledge through a Knowledge Base or prompts trains nothing at all.
- Bedrock keeps data encrypted in the customer's account and region and does not share it with model providers.
- Fine-tuning on Bedrock produces a private copy of the model, still not shared.
- PrivateLink endpoints keep the traffic off the public internet if the scenario also asks for that.
The same sentence often appears together with "citations", which confirms retrieval as the intended answer.
Where do Trainium and Inferentia sit, and what is the one fact the exam wants about them?
They are AWS-designed chips on the infrastructure layer, Trainium for training and Inferentia for inference, offered as a lower-cost, energy-efficient alternative to GPUs.
- They appear in questions about cost-efficient or sustainable model training and serving.
- SageMaker and Bedrock can run on them without the customer choosing hardware.
- Instance sizing and cluster design are out of scope.
Responsible-AI questions about environmental impact accept "use purpose-built AI chips and smaller models" as a sustainability measure.
How should the weights guide preparation time?
Roughly in proportion, but with extra time on domains 4 and 5, whose 28 percent combined is made of named tools and standards that must be memorised rather than reasoned out.
- Domain 3's 28 percent is mostly Bedrock, RAG, prompting and metrics, which are intuitive once seen.
- Domain 1 is definitions and a service catalogue; flashcards work.
- The Bedrock article pays off across all five domains.
Working each article's question set aloud is closer to the exam than re-reading, because the exam is recognition under a time limit.
An ordering question asks for the stages of the ML lifecycle. What is the canonical order?
Define the business goal, collect data, explore and pre-process it, engineer features, train the model, tune hyperparameters, evaluate, deploy, then monitor and re-train.
- The generative-AI equivalent is the foundation model lifecycle: data selection, model selection, pre-training, fine-tuning, evaluation, deployment, feedback.
- The RAG query flow is another ordering favourite: embed the question, search the vector store, augment the prompt, generate.
- Ordering questions give no partial credit, so the whole sequence must be right.
Article 4 maps a SageMaker feature onto each stage, which is how the exam usually asks about it.